Ed Pegg Jr., May 16, 2005

"THE CHANCE ELEMENT in thousands of indoor games is introduced by a variety of
simple random-number generators. The most popular of such devices, ever since the
time of ancient Egypt, have been cubical dice. Why cubical? Because of their symmetry,
any of the five regular solids can be and have been used as gaming dice, but the
cube has certain obvious advantages over the other four solids. It is the easiest
to make, its six sides accommodate a set of numbers neither too large nor too small,
and it rolls easily enough but not too easily." (Martin Gardner, *Mathematical
Magic Show*)

The quote above is taken from Martin Gardner's *Mathematical Games:
The Entire Collection of his Scientific American Columns*. This CD collection
of all 15 books is fully searchable, and is sold by the very site you're visiting,
The Mathematical Association of America. In his column on dice, he mentions that
an icosahedron is inside the
Magic 8-ball, and that dice date back to 2000 BC. You can see a gallery of ancient dice at Arjan Verweij's site. In 2003, the auction house Christie's of New York offered
a roman glass gaming die from the 2nd century AD.

Figure 1. An ancient icosahedron.

For more dice history, I will defer to the excellent Wikipedia article on dice. One question -- are the dice fair? Does each face with equal probability when it is tossed?

The cube (d6) and icosahedron (d20) are
two *possibilities* for fair dice. Most people are familiar with the platonic
solids.

Figure 2. The platonic solids as dice.

When made precisely, the platonic solids are isohedral,
which means all the faces are the same, and that all faces have the same relationship
with other faces. There are 25 isohedra, and 5 infinite classes of isohedra.
There are also such things as spheres (d1), lenses (d2), and rolling logs (d*n*).
Here's a chart of all of them.

Figure 3. All the isohedra.

Of these, only a handful have been manufactured. 5 and 7 sided dice can be seen
in this picture, I'll get to those later. In addition to the below, Kevin
Cook's collection contains manufactured examples of the rhombic
dodecagon (d12), the isosceles tetrahedron (d4), and a variety of the 2*n* forms.
He also has some prototypes and paper models. As an exercise, make 8 copies of
any triangle, the more irregular the better
(preferably drawn with a ruler). Now, assemble them to make a d8. For actual dice
you can buy easily, I believe the following picture is a complete set.

Figure 4. All the manufactured isohedra.

Several people have built large and wonderful sites with extensive polyhedra discussion, such as George Hart, Sándor Kabai, Bathsheba Grossman, Eric Weisstein, Robert Webb, and David Eppstein. Below is an image by Sándor that shows how d30s (triacontahedra) can be attached together.

Figure 5. An icosahedron made from triacontahedron, by Sándor Kabai.

Are these objects really fair dice? For advertising purposes, Lou Zocchi uses a photograph of icosahedra made by various companies, stacked 10 high. If the dice were perfectly symmetrical, the heights would be identical -- but they are not, in his photograph. The slight irregularities allowed for a predictable bias, with the favored number depending on the manufacturer. I tested his claims by using a set of calipers on my own dice. The white d20 above ranges in height from .7 inches to .72 inches, depending on which face is up. It looks like a fair die, but it isn't. Some of the "cubic" dice I measured are similarly lopsided.

How can one measure fairness? Perhaps the center of gravity (the centroid) can be used. In the figure below, the edges of a cube have been projected onto a sphere, centered on the center of gravity of the cube. In the middle projection, the cube is fair, and all the resulting spherical polygons have equal area. In the last projection, the die is weighted to one side. The resulting spherical polygons have different areas, and suggest that the weighted side would most often be the bottom side.

Figure 6. The Geometric Model applied to a cube.

With this model, it is easy to calculate the heights of "fair" prisms and anti-prisms.

unit sided n-gon |
3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |

Prism Height | .5336 | 1.000 | 1.5060 | 2.0598 | 2.6602 | 3.3049 | 3.9916 | 4.7181 | 5.4824 | 6.2828 |

Antiprism Height | .8165 | 1.4953 | 2.2270 | 3.0244 | 3.8864 | 4.8100 | 5.7921 | 6.8297 | 7.9202 | 9.0613 |

What height should a coin be to have a 1/3 chance of landing on Sides? John von Neumann used the Geometric Model to solve this problem in his head, and provided an answer to three decimal places in half a minute. Can you match his feat?

I once put a lot of faith in this geometric model, until the I enthusiastically
explained it to my professor.
At the last minute, I'd built a model of an irregular heptahedra I'd done calculations
for. My explanation went pretty well. "The chance it will come
to rest on *this* side
is 10 percent," I concluded. To my horror, my model toppled over onto another
side. I tried to make it stay on the one face, but it kept toppling.
It wasn't a stable face. My professor just smiled -- he didn't need to explain to me that something was seriously wrong with the model I'd been using. Later, I learned of unistable polyhedra that are stable
on only one face.

Figure 8. A unistable polyhedron with the fewest known faces, and a cross-section.

I realized that any realistic model for dice would need to take into account the the amount of energy required to topple from one face to another. A nickel is 2mm thick, with a diameter of 21mm. Using trigonometry, the topple heights are .094mm and 21.095mm -- it doesn't take much energy to knock an nickel off edge. With an unstable face, zero energy is required.

The Energy State Model works correctly for polyhedra with unstable faces. Depending on the
type of die, and the surface, a die will bounce a different number of times.
Before the first bounce, the Geometric Model can be used to determine which face of
the die has current influence. During each bounce, a matrix can be set up to determine
the relative probabilities that other faces will inherit influence for the next
bounce. Thus, a series of matrices can be used to model what is happening to a
die. All of these matrices are different, because the amount of energy
possessed by the die decreases geometrically with each bounce **.** In
order for the model to work, some *n*th bounce must relate to an identity
matrix, relating to a state where there isn’t enough energy left to shift
the die from any face to any other face. Bouncing dice are somewhat similar to
a Markov process.

**Energy State Model**: Let *q _{jk}* =
(radians swept from point under centroid on face

A=_{jk}q(1 -_{jk}f(h/_{jk}eb))^{n}

A= 1 - (sum of other entries in_{jj}jcolumn)= Matrix of the

A_{n}Aentries.

The initial state vector ** x** can be
determined by the Geometric model. The final probability distribution

Figure 9. Computed results for 10,000 tosses of a die with drilled dimples.

A nickel is 2mm thick, with a diameter of 21mm. Other values can be assigned
arbitrarily: *e* (kinetic energy, or force of flip) = 200, *b* (bounciness
or elasticity) = .2. The elasticity matters a lot. Flipping a nickel onto mud might
have elasticity 0.01, whereas glass might be .4 With the setup here, a nickel lands
on edge roughly 15 times out of every hundred million tosses. It's happened several
times in recorded history. On December
1, 1707, composer Jeremiah Clarke mentioned an occurrence in his suicide note (his
coin flip to pick the suicide method landed edge first in the mud). In mud, a coin
hardly bounces, so it will land on edge much more often.

Dan Murray did calculations for a coin landing on edge for *Physical
Review E*. He later built a dice-rolling machine, and used it to test Vegas dice (purportedly manufactured to a tolerance of 1/5000th of an inch) and other shape.
One object he tested was cylinders
of various heights. As might be expected from
the Energy State model, the coefficient of restitution (bounciness) has a large effect
on behavior.

Figure 10. From Experiments
with Cylindrical Dice by Dan Murray.

A thick coin cannot be made perfectly fair as a 3-sided die. It depends too much on how you're tossing it, and the surface the coin lands on. If you want something perfectly fair, it has to be isohedral, and made precisely.

Before World War Two, Germany was considered the best place for high-precision
engineering. As war tensions rose, high-precision
engineers in the United States started getting more work. One of those engineers,
Louis Zocchi, engraved a tiny circle on the head of a pin, then inscribed the Lord's
Prayer inside that circle. The pins effectively advertised his firm after showing
up in *Ripley's Believe it or Not*, and led to lots of high-precision
work in support of the war effort.

In 1975, his son, Lou Zocchi retired from the Air Force and started focusing more
on his hobbies. His game design *Battle of Britain* had been quite popular.
At about the same time, Dungeons & Dragons became popular. D&D needed lots of various
dice, d20s in particular, and the dice available at the time were fairly horrible.
They failed the caliper test, and were made from soft plastic.

Zocchi founded the company Gamescience, and followed in the footsteps of his father to make high-precision, high-impact dice. I measured various isohedral dice I purchased from his company, and all of them passed the caliper test. If you buy dice at a game store, you might want to bring a set of calipers with you, because I found various dice from other companies are still slightly irregular.

In addition to having manufactured the classic d4, d6, d8, d12, and d20 (the platonic solids), Zocchi has made more unusual dice. The d16 and d24 are exclusive to him. A d14 will be available from him by the end of the summer.

Figure 11. Other isohedral dice

In addition, Zocchi sells Bernard Bereuter's patented (4900034) d7, and his own design for a d5. (There are lots of dice patents) These prisms are interesting to experiment with. In a hundred rolls, there doesn't seem to be any appreciable bias. However, they aren't fair. If you throw these dice on a different surface, it will slightly change the likelihood that the 5 or 7 will come up.

Figure 12. The d5 (displaying 2 and 5) and d7 (displaying 7 and 4 (orange pips)).

Are they fair enough? I'd say they are more fair than many of the lop-sided dice that are sold today. They are a delightful object for school math projects, and can add an interesting twist to many games. They are fair enough, and I salute Zocchi for making them.

D. Christie, R. Glasheen, C. Hamilton, M. Imoto, P. Matthews, J. Moffat, T. Monajemi, D. B. Murray, J. Nelson and A. Sturm, "Experimentally Obtained Statistics of Dice Rolls," 6th Experimental Chaos Conference, July 22-26, 2001, Potsdam, Germany, http://www.geocities.com/dicephysics/0107.htm.

Kevin Cook, "What Shapes Do Dice have?" http://www.dicecollector.com/diceinfo_how_many_shapes.html.

H. Croft, K. Falconer, and R. K. Guy, Problem B12 in *Unsolved Problems in Geometry*, New York: Springer-Verlag, p. 61, 1991.

Dice-play, "Crooked Dice," http://homepage.ntlworld.com/dice-play/DiceCrooked.htm.

Fiendation.com, "Mystery of the Magic Eight Ball Revealed," http://www.fiendation.com/people/chris/eight.htm.

Martin Gardner, "Dice," *Mathematical Magic Show*, Random House Inc., p 251-262, 1978.

Sándor Kabai, Mathematical Graphics II, http://www.kabai.hu/.

Mitch Klink, "What Other Shapes of Dice are There?" http://members.aol.com/dicetalk/polymore.htm.

Dan Murray, "The Physics of Dice," http://www.geocities.com/dicephysics/.

Daniel B. Murray and Scott W. Teare, "Probability of a tossed coin landing on edge", Physical Review E, volume 48, p. 2547-2552, 1993.

Justin Smith, "Constructing a fair 3 sided coin," http://www.martini.nu/justin/3sided.htm.

Arjan Verweij, "Gallery of Ancient Dice," http://membres.lycos.fr/arjan/.

Eric W. Weisstein. "Geometric Centroid, Isohedron, Spherical Polygon, Platonic Solid, Unistable
Polyhedron." From *MathWorld*--A
Wolfram Web Resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Isohedron.html.

David Wells, *The Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting
Geometry*, London: Penguin, p.~265, 1991.

Comments are welcome. Please send comments to Ed Pegg Jr. at ed@mathpuzzle.com.

Ed Pegg Jr. is the webmaster for mathpuzzle.com. He works at Wolfram Research, Inc. as an associate editor of *MathWorld*, and as administrator of the *Mathematica* Information Center.